The Catholic doctrines of social justice are sometimes described as the Church’s “best kept secret”. The release of Pope Benedict’s new encyclical Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth), it must be hoped, will bring these teachings — the Church’s concern about the world as it is and how it should be — into sharp focus.
Pope Benedict, the theologian pope, has added to the wealth of writings on social justice by Popes Leo XIII, Pius XI, John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II, placing particular emphasis on the theology which underpins the Church’s social doctrines.

Pope Benedict XVI signs a copy of his encyclical Caritas in Veritate.CNS photo: L'Osservatore Romano via Reuters
In the secular view, Pope Benedict is typically characterised, indeed caricatured, as a political conservative. If his previous statements on matters such as economics, development, labour, the environment and latterly the global financial crisis failed to offer a clue to the contrary, Caritas in Veritate presents a radical manifesto for a transformation of social, economic and personal values.
It is likely that Pope Benedict’s call for reform will be largely unheeded, even as the current economic crisis presents a singular opportunity for it. After all, Pope Pius XI’s prophetic words in 1931, as the world suffered the effects of the Wall Street Crash of 1929, fell on deaf ears: “Free competition, and especially economic domination, must be kept within definite and proper bounds, and must be brought under effective control of the public authority” (Quadragesimo Anno, as paraphrased by Pope Paul VI in 1975). Almost eight decades later, in Caritas in Veritate we have set of principles that may serve as a premise from which to develop a conversion of social and economic relations for the common good.
Most profoundly, Pope Benedict describes the human person as “the primary capital to be safeguarded and valued”. He observes rightly that the world has lost its respect for the human person: “When a society moves towards the denial or suppression of life, it ends up no longer finding the necessary motivation and energy to strive for man’s true good. If personal and social sensitivity towards the acceptance of a new life is lost, then other forms of acceptance that are valuable for society also wither away.”
This finds expression not only in societies where abortions are seen as tolerable, but also in the manner by which the profit motive trumps the dignity of the person. “How”, the pope asks, “can we be surprised by the indifference shown towards situations of human degradation when such indifference extends even to our attitude towards what is and is not human?” Here the pope transcends competing ideological camps; his encyclical will make uncomfortable reading for conservatives and liberals alike.
Most radical, in economic terms, is his critique of the free market. Pope John Paul II was no less critical of unfettered capitalism, but Pope Benedict is able to buttress his argument with the knowledge of recent experience. The present economic crisis has exposed the free, unregulated market as a corrupted (and corrupting) system grounded in greed that fails to serve the common good.
The Holy Father cites several examples of how greed — the primacy of profit and consumption — has caused immense harm. South Africans will concur when he criticises the “excessive zeal for protecting knowledge through an unduly rigid assertion of the right to intellectual property”. He does not refer to specifics, but it is apparent that he is pointing at pharmaceutical companies who challenged the distribution of generic antiretroviral medicines to poor people with HIV. If the pope was reading South African newspapers, he might well have included among gravely sinful market practices the scandal of price-fixing, which is rife in this country.
The pope does not, however, blame an abstract economic system for the crisis. We must hold accountable “individuals, their moral conscience and their personal and social responsibility”. The deleterious effects of capitalism therefore are not inevitable, but can be negated. The system could be a force for good.
He notes that “the conviction that the economy must be autonomous, that it must be shielded from ‘influences’ of a moral character, has led man to abuse the economic process in a thoroughly destructive way”.
In short, the current model of capitalism is in need of thorough reform and some type of regulation. Pope Benedict suggests that when necessary the “political community” should intercede in the economy for the common good. But this, he notes, requires that governments — individually and, in a globalised world, jointly — have a clear moral vision. This in itself calls for radical modifications.
While much of Caritas in Veritate speaks to us in our immediate circumstance — within the context of the economic crisis — it is not a document of reaction. The scandal of most wealth being held by a few as multitudes go hungry is perennial. The Church’s concrete proposals are few. As Pope Benedict writes, “the Church does not have technical solutions to propose”. The encyclical’s immense value resides in its timeless appeal for a new consciousness, rooted in the Gospel, which acknowledges and embraces the dignity of all humanity in charity.
In the course of the encyclical Pope Benedict provides many practical incentives for doing so — such as, in his direst warnings, the preservation of peace — but the purest, and therefore most persuasive argument, is made right at the beginning of the letter when he writes:
“Charity in truth, to which Jesus Christ bore witness by his earthly life and especially by his death and resurrection, is the principal driving force behind the authentic development of every person and of all humanity. Love — caritas — is an extraordinary force which leads people to opt for courageous and generous engagement in the field of justice and peace.”






The latest Encyclical, so fulsomely and justly applauded here, deals a body blow to a point often encountered in various forms, but which can be expressed as the mistaken idea that the commandment of love somehow trumps the magisterium.
We have seen it in this website in articles and threads concerning those infected with HIV, or the unfortunate recent case of the young Brasilian girl impregnated by her step-father and subjected to a so-called “therapeutic” abortion procedure:-
people are encouraged to disregard the Church’s clear teaching on the grounds that it “lacks compassion”.
As the Holy Father explains, Christ’s Truth – preserved and handed on by the Church He founded – is not curtailed by, or made subject to the commandment of love, for they co-exist in mutual reciprocity but under the primacy of Truth. This a core teaching of the Encyclical which this editorial overlooks.
This point is made with marvellous precision of thought by the Holy Father in the Introduction where he writes as follows:-
“To defend the truth, to articulate it with humility and conviction, and to bear witness to it in life are therefore exacting and indispensable forms of charity. Charity, in fact, ‘rejoices in the truth’ (1 Cor 13:6). ” [para.1];
“Truth needs to be sought, found and expressed within the ‘economy’ of charity, but charity in its turn needs to be understood, confirmed and practised in the light of truth.” [para.2];
“Only in truth does charity shine forth, only in truth can charity be authentically lived. Truth is the light that gives meaning and value to charity . . Without truth, charity degenerates into sentimentality. Love becomes an empty shell, to be filled in an arbitrary way. In a culture without truth, this is the fatal risk facing love. It falls prey to contingent subjective emotions and opinions, the word “love” is abused and distorted, to the point where it comes to mean the opposite.” [para.3];
“A Christianity of charity without truth would be more or less interchangeable with a pool of good sentiments, helpful for social cohesion, but of little relevance. In other words, there would no longer be any real place for God in the world.” [para.4]; and
“Without truth, without trust and love for what is true, there is no social conscience and responsibility, and social action ends up serving private interests and the logic of power,” [para.5].
Let us learn to love the Truth, and let us (even more) learn to recognise where that Truth is to be found.
[this post reprises an earlier post of mine under another thread]
I thought that fundamentalists took a sentence from scripture out of context to make it prop up an opinion or argument.
In the context of 1 Cor. 13 – a beautiful hymn by St Paul to his beloved saviour, Jesus Christ – a hymn to Love – he also says ‘[charity] does not rejoice in injustice’!
Love and truth are inseparable, they go hand in glove, as emphasised by our Holy Father when he writes in the same paragraph of ALL people: “love and truth never abandon them completely, because these are the vocation planted by God in the heart and mind of every human person”.
This is why anything originating in the Magisterium that does not resonate in people’s heart as ‘compassion’ WILL be rejected.
We have to defend our personal truth, but Truth itself does not need defending. The work of the Church per se is to mediate Truth and we know the ground rules around infallible truth!
So you are the one who is mistaken, Martin, when you confuse “Magisterium” with absolute truth, confuse law and doctrine, with the inseparable Love and Truth in the person of Jesus. What is inseparable cannot have primacy over the other!
So test this out. For all the quotes you give from the encyclical try substituting the words ‘charity’ and ‘truth’ e.g. “Without love, without trust in what Caritas stands for, there is no social conscience and responsibility … etc.
St Paul – an apostle appointed by Jesus Christ – also warns at the start of Chapter 13. If I speak…. but do not have love, then I have turned into a sounding brass or a clashing cymbal. (Nicholas King’s NT)