Letters Editor

Jesus birthday not ‘pagan’


From Malcolm Bagley, Cape Town:

When Christians observe Lent or Advent, there seems to be an outcry from the media (and periphery evangelicals) that Catholics have commandeered these seasons from pagans, for our own use.

The questions never answered by this group are: Why would this type of action be beneficial to Catholic Christians, and why would pagans be affected if Catholics chose to celebrate the birth of Christ on the same day?

In the minds of Jews and pagans in the first, second, third and fourth centuries, Christians were a politically powerless and despised lot, worthy only of persecution. And persecuted they were, in the most brutal way.

There is evidence East and West  in the second and third centuries that before being celebrated liturgically, Christians in Rome judged December 25 to be the birthday of Christ. This date is essentially the by-product of attempts to calculate when to celebrate his death and resurrection.

There was no fixed date for the pagan celebration of the Birth of the Unconquered Sun until the reign of Roman emperor Aurelian (270-275), who fixed this date at December 25.

Comments

One Response to “Jesus birthday not ‘pagan’”

  1. Andre Schoeman on September 16th, 2011

    I found your article very interesting and would like you to contact me via email or cell. 0824465283 from Andre Schoeman, Plasdenam Flats, central, PE

Leave a Reply




Search Our Site

  • This Weeks Issue

    The Headlines

    » Catholic ethos in education
    » Positive upbringing, positive sounds – Zolani Mahola of Freshlyground
    » Tradition: How Vatican II was conservative
    » Fr Ron Rolheiser: Purity of heart and intention
    » THIS WEEK’S EDITORIAL: The Catholic School

    Read More | Archives

The Southern Cross © 2009 | Disclaimer | A New Media Solution by Posmay Media