Report on Cologne Cardinal’s PR Strategy Prompts Renewed Outrage

by CNS · August 16, 2022

Cardinal Rainer Maria Woelki of Cologne, Germany, gestures during a news conference in Cologne in this March 23, 2021, file photo. (CNS photo/Oliver Berg, KNA pool)

By CNS -A recent report on the public relations strategy used by Cologne Cardinal Rainer Maria Woelki during a clerical sex abuse scandal has provoked renewed controversy, even after the cardinal’s March return from his six-month sabbatical initiated by Pope Francis, reported the German Catholic news agency KNA.

Tim Kurzbach, president of the Diocesan Council of Catholics in the Archdiocese of Cologne, told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung newspaper Aug. 15 the cardinal should take another, longer sabbatical.

“I hope that someone will now soon take responsibility in the interests of the people in the Archdiocese of Cologne,” Kurzbach said.

Early the same day, the Catholic reform group Maria 2.0 symbolically blocked access to the administrative headquarters of the archdiocese by stretching red and white barrier tape across the entrance and attaching a photo of a padlock with the message: “Vicar General’s office Cologne CLOSED. Moral bankruptcy.”

In addition, 21 diocesan employees demanded a new beginning with “personnel and systemic changes” and called on people to join the campaign.

Several prominent archdiocesan leaders have called for explanations, KNA reported. In Remscheid, less than 48kms northeast of Cologne, Msgr. Thomas Kaster — who as city dean is the highest representative of the Catholic Church in the city — called on Pope Francis to issue a clear statement on Cardinal Woelki.

After allegations and accusations of mishandling reports on how the archdiocese dealt with clerical sex abuse, the cardinal has submitted a letter of resignation to the pope, who has not yet made a decision.

“What is happening is that there are a lot of pressure groups, and under pressure it is not possible to discern,” Pope Francis told the editors of 10 Jesuit magazines in mid-June. “To be able to discern, I am waiting until there is no pressure. The fact that there are different points of view is fine. The problem is when there is pressure. That does not help.”

The renewed criticism was mainly triggered by a report in the Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger newspaper about the public relations strategy of the diocesan leadership.

On Aug. 5, the Cologne newspaper reported that Cardinal Woelki’s consultants had advised him and other leaders to persuade the victims’ advisory board to back his decision to commission a new legal firm in October 2020 to conduct an investigative report into the archdiocese’s handling of abuse. The newspaper cited an internal paper headlined “How the cardinal ‘survives’ until March 2021.”

At the time, Cardinal Woelki had been criticised for refusing to publish a previous legal report on the grounds that it contained methodological flaws.

The report said communications consultants had advised Cardinal Woelki and other representatives of the archdiocese to show “emotions” in a meeting with the victims’ advisory board and to have “jokers” up their sleeves, KNA reported.

Later, several members of the advisory board resigned from it, saying they had been taken by surprise when the change of law firm was approved and felt abused a second time. Many criticized this as an instrumentalisation of abuse victims.

However, Msgr. Guido Assmann, vicar general, rejected the accusation. He said the actions of the archdiocese had “always and exclusively” been guided by the victims’ point of view, KNA reported.

The advisory board’s former spokesman, Peter Bringmann-Henselder, told the Kölnische Rundschau daily newspaper Aug. 19 that the archdiocese did not instrumentalize or manipulate victims.

There may have been recommendations from a public relations agency, Bringmann-Henselder said. However, the advisory board was not subjected to pressure or any other kind of influence. Lawyers presented reasons for and against a change of experts and afterward, the advisory board was offered time to think it over. The members present rejected this offer.

“All this happened neither under pressure nor under any kind of influence. Nothing was orchestrated here,” said Bringmann-Henselder.