The Liturgical Changes
I have been in communication with a friend in the United States, Paul Turner a diocesan priest of the diocese of Kansas City-St Joseph, Missouri who is a liturgist and one of the secretaries of ICEL (International Committee on English in the Liturgy).
I have shared with Paul the consternation felt by many in South Africa over the liturgical changes which were implemented in December, 2008.
Paul wrote:
“The Order of Mass was issued for study purposes only, not for implementation until the entire missal is ready. The Vatican has asked the English-speaking conferences of bishops for their final comments on the rest of the translation by this November. Then the Vatican will approve the final text – having made many more changes, I’m sure. I think even the “final” Order of Mass that we have is not really “final”. There are a few discrepancies that need to be fixed. Bishop Hugh Slattery was at the meeting in January, but somehow I missed the information that this was already being used in South Africa.”
So why did the bishops move so quickly when we and the rest of the world are only to implement the changes in about two years (from another of his emails)? What does the Church in South Africa stand to gain from this? Perhaps our experience is a caution to the rest of the English-speaking world. But will the Vatican take note and learn from it?
- Sr Sue Rakoczy: What Restricts Women in Taking Leadership - September 14, 2020
- Shameful Behaviour of Some Priests - August 29, 2017
- NCR ends online comments - January 15, 2014