Can ET Call Anyone? Jesuit Astronomer Studies Intragalactic Possibilities

by CNS · August 29, 2020

This NASA artist’s concept illustrates a young, red dwarf star surrounded by three planets. (CNS illustration/NASA, PL-Caltech)

By Carol Glatz – Astronomers construct and play with a variety of mathematical models, and one popular model looks at how likely it is that civilisations on different planets could end up contacting each other.

Scientists have proposed various simulations and predictions, and now a Jesuit astronomer and former director of the Vatican Observatory has co-authored a study offering a new set of results.

Jesuit Father Jose Funes, an expert in galaxies and extragalactic astronomy, together with fellow Argentinians Luciana Gramajo and lead author Marcelo Lares, have addressed the problem of “estimating the probabilities of causal contacts between civilisations in the galaxy” in a paper published in the International Journal of Astrobiology.

It’s a long-standing puzzle, stemming from a conversation in the summer of 1950 among a group of physicists who were wondering: If there is such a high probability of life existing elsewhere in the universe, then, as Enrico Fermi was alleged to have said, “Where is everybody?”

The so-called Fermi paradox led Frank Drake to formulate what became known as the Drake equation – a series of factors used for quantifying “the number of civilisations from whom we might receive an electromagnetic signal,” the new study said.

Over the decades, more scientists attempted to explain this paradox with new propositions and statistical approaches, including the new study that was part of the multidisciplinary think-tank initiative, “OTHER,” which is directed by Father Funes.

The Jesuit priest is also the chair in science, religion and education at the Catholic University of Cordoba, Argentina, and serves on the advisory council of METI International; METI or Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence is part of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, or SETI.

Because there is no empirical evidence of intelligent life existing on other planets, scientists must stick to the theoretical world of statistical models and methods.

Father Funes told Catholic News Service Aug. 25, “Our model is a very simple one, but it gives a realistic perspective on what to expect for a first contact with an ET civilisation.”

“Our paper suggests that though the odds are not very high, there is a chance to communicate with ET,” he said in an email response to questions.

The “OTHER” research team developed a simplified model using just three parameters based on the three questions: how rare is it for a civilisation to come into being; how long does a civilisation last; and how far can a signal emitted by one civilisation be detected by another?

The group then developed and ran more than 150,000 computational simulations that plug in those three variables to make thousands of different scenarios.

The different models use different values, ranging from pessimistic to optimistic, with civilisations – called nodes – that crop up frequently, last a long time and have the technological capability and compatibility to emit and receive signals at great distances.

Their research concluded that the huge distances between points in the galaxy and the limited lifespan of civilisations at their most advanced stages, for example, lasting just 100 years, could explain why there would be no detection of signals from extraterrestrial civilisations.

However, their conclusion that contact is “extremely unlikely unless the galaxy is densely populated by intelligent civilisations with large average lifetimes” is similar to results by other authors that estimate “contact between the Earth and another intelligent civilisation in the galaxy is quite unlikely.”

“All this effort in studying probabilities and communicating with alien civilisations helps to understand better who we are,” Father Funes said. “It is important to step out from our anthropomorphic and anthropocentric way of thinking to deal with a very profound diversity, the cosmic otherness.”