Vatican Canon Law Official Explains ‘Amoris Laetitia’
The provisions of “Amoris Laetitia” allow people in irregular marriage situations access to the sacraments only if they recognise their situation is sinful and desire to change it, according to the cardinal who heads the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts.
The fact that such a couple also believes changing the situation immediately by splitting up would cause more harm and forgoing sexual relations would threaten their current relationship does not rule out the possibility of receiving sacramental absolution and Communion, said Cardinal Francesco Coccopalmerio, president of the pontifical council that is charged with interpreting canon law.
The intention to change, even if the couple cannot do so immediately, “is exactly the theological element that allows absolution and access to the Eucharist as long as – I repeat – there is the impossibility of immediately changing the situation of sin,” the cardinal wrote.
Cardinal Coccopalmerio’s short booklet, “The Eighth Chapter of the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia,” was published in Italian by the Vatican publishing house and presented to journalists. It includes material compiled from articles and speeches the cardinal has given about the pope’s document on marriage and family life.
The cardinal was unable to attend the presentation because of a meeting at the Congregation for Saints’ Causes, said Salesian Father Giuseppe Costa, director of the Vatican publishing house.
“To whom can the church absolutely not concede penance and the Eucharist (because) it would be a glaring contradiction?” the cardinal asked in the book. “To one who, knowing he or she is in a state of serious sin and having the ability to change, has no sincere intention of carrying it out.”
Cardinal Coccopalmerio quoted “Amoris Laetitia” to make his point: “Naturally, if someone flaunts an objective sin as if it were part of the Christian ideal, or wants to impose something other than what the church teaches … such a person needs to listen once more to the Gospel message and its call to conversion.”
Father Maurizio Gronchi, a theologian and consultant to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, told reporters Feb. 14 that Cardinal Coccopalmerio’s reading of “Amoris Laetitia” is the same as the bishops of Malta, Germany and the church region of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Those bishops have issued guidelines that include the possibility of eventually allowing divorced and civilly remarried Catholics access to the sacraments without first requiring an annulment of their sacramental marriage or a firm commitment to abstaining from sexual relations.
Dozens of other bishops around the world, including Archbishop Charles J. Chaput of Philadelphia, head of the U.S. bishops’ ad hoc committee for implementing “Amoris Laetitia,” have insisted church teaching prohibits persons in an objective state of mortal sin from receiving the Eucharist and those who, in the eyes of the church, are not married to a person they are having sex with are in such a state of sin.
Father Costa told reporters the cardinal’s book is not “the Vatican response” to the challenges posed by U.S. Cardinal Raymond L. Burke and three retired cardinals to the supposed lack of clarity and potential misunderstanding of “Amoris Laetitia.” Rather, he said, it is an “authoritative” reading of the papal document and a contribution to the ongoing discussion.
In his document, Pope Francis affirms the constant teaching of the Catholic Church on the indissolubility of marriage and the sinful state of those who cohabit and those who form a second union while one or both of them are still bound sacramentally in marriage to another person, Cardinal Coccopalmerio wrote.
The only time such persons would not be in a state of mortal sin, he wrote, is if they were ignorant of church teaching, were unable to understand church teaching or “knew the norm and its goodness, but were unable to act as the norm indicates without incurring another fault.”
Cardinal Coccopalmerio cited the case of a woman who enters into a relationship with a man who, along with his small children, was abandoned by his wife. The woman knows the relationship is not in accordance with church teaching, but leaving the man and his small children would devastate him and leave the children without a maternal figure.
In writing that the church could admit such a couple to the sacraments with the “verification of two essential conditions — that they desire to change that situation, but they cannot act on their desire,” the cardinal said the verification must be done with “attentive and authoritative discernment” under the guidance of a priest.
Does “welcoming the sinner justify the person’s behavior and renounce doctrine?” the cardinal asked. “Certainly not.”
Father Gronchi told reporters “Amoris Laetitia” is not reaching out to couples who are “peaceful and tranquil” while living in situations that are not in harmony with the Gospel, rather it is offering guidance, hope and the possibility of sacramental grace to couples who know they are in sinful situations and want to change.
The papal document and the cardinal’s book are “not saying, ‘amnesty for all,'” Father Gronchi said. “It’s about indicating possible paths to conversion, not to amnesty.” By Cindy Wooden Catholic News Service
- 6 Christmas Myths You May Have Fallen For - December 16, 2020
- How a Heresy Almost Won the Church - November 24, 2020
- What We Catholics Believe – And Why - November 24, 2020
According to the cardinal, a person who is in an objectively adulterous relationship can “access the Eucharist as long as there is the impossibility of immediately changing the situation of sin”. By making this claim he is saying that sometimes the commandments are impossible for a Catholic to observe and it is impossible to avoid sinning. I don’t see any reason why this new development shouldn’t be seen as an opening not only for adulterers but also hitmen, human traffickers, abortionists, etc. For people who rely on such professions to provide for their family (which could very well be broken up were they to be left without financial security) it may well seem “impossible” to repent and “change their situation of sin”.
Yet the Council of Trent declared that “if anyone says that the commandments of God are, even for one that is justified and constituted in grace, impossible to observe, let him be anathema.” Likewise Scripture teaches that “no temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your strength, but with the temptation will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it” (1 Cor 10:13).
If the cardinal is right, the obvious theological and pastoral consequence is that sometimes God’s grace is not enough to enable us to obey Him, and that we sometimes are tempted beyond our strength. Grave sins that potential involve even murder might not be a hindrance to partaking of the sacramental life of the Church. It would also mean that Ecumenical Councils are not infallible in their declarations.
Or perhaps Sacred Scripture and the Church’s infallible teaching are right, and the cardinal and Amoris Laetitia are wrong. The idea that people sleeping with other people’s wives can sometimes receive Holy Communion has never been taught by the Church ever before, after all.